I P 1 debat idag diskuteredes Durban II af Michael Jalving, Berlingske Tidende & Anette Faye Jacobsen, chefkonsulent, Institut for Menneskerettigheder. For “guderettigheder”, ville Jalving sige. Den sidste var aldeles immun overfor de videre perspektiver i “dialogen”, der her ridses op i al tydelighed af Wall Street Journal:. Når alt er til debat, er der ingen umistelige værdier mere, og FN og Institut for Menneskerettigheder har overflødiggjort sig selv. Eneste gode – så er de penge sparet. De nødlidende bliver dem dem, der har brug for FN. Vi kan klare os uden.
“Jordan’s attempt at criminalizing free speech beyond its own borders wouldn’t be so serious if it were an isolated case. Unfortunately, it is part of a larger campaign to use the law and international forums to intimidate critics of militant Islam. For instance, in December the United Nations General Assembly passed the Resolution on Combating Defamation of Religions; the only religion mentioned by name was Islam. While such resolutions aren’t legally binding, national governments sometimes cite them as justification for legislation or other actions.
More worrying, the U.N. Human Rights Council in June said it would refrain from condemning human-rights abuses related to “a particular religion.” The ban applies to all religions, but it was prompted by Muslim countries that complained about linking Islamic law, Shariah, to such outrages as female genital mutilation and death by stoning for adulterers. This kind of self-censorship could prove dangerous for people suffering abuse, and it follows the council’s March decision to have its expert on free speech investigate individuals and the media for negative comments about Islam. [..]
Unless democratic countries stand up to this challenge to free speech, other nations may be emboldened to follow the Jordanian example. Kangaroo courts across the globe will be ready to charge free people with obscure violations of other societies’ norms and customs, and send Interpol to bring them to stand trial in frivolous litigation.
A new form of forum shopping would soon take root. Activists would be able to choose countries whose laws and policies are informed by their religious values to prosecute critical voices in other countries. The case before the Jordanian court is not just about Mr. Wilders and the Danes. It is about the subjugation of Western standards of free speech to fear and coercion by foreign courts.” (se også Jalving : Verden vil give Hans-Otto splid)
Dum, dummere, journalist
For hver Lars Hedegaard, Uwe Max Jensen eller Bent Blüdnikow er der et utal af overbetalte glatnakker som kun undtagelsesvis (f. eks. Dan Rather eller Jeppe Nybroe) mister pladsen i parnasset fordi de gik lige ét skridt for langt i manipulationen og løgnagtigheden. Og så har jeg slet ikke nævnt dem der bare ikke kan læse indenad – ond vilje eller ej (LFPC).
From ABC’s Charlie Gibson’s interview with Sarah Palin last night:
GIBSON: You said recently, in your old church, “Our national leaders are sending U.S. soldiers on a task that is from God.” Are we fighting a holy war?
PALIN: You know, I don’t know if that was my exact quote.
GIBSON: Exact words.
“Pray for our military men and women who are striving to do what is right. Also, for this country, that our leaders, our national leaders, are sending [U.S. soldiers] out on a task that is from God,” she exhorted the congregants. “That’s what we have to make sure that we’re praying for, that there is a plan and that that plan is God’s plan.”
[…] So when someone accurately quotes Muslims calling their war a Holy War, that is Islamophobia. When someone misquotes Sarah Palin calling a war against jihad terrorists a Holy War, that’s journalism. […] If you quote someone inaccurately, you’re a journalist. If you quote someone accurately, you’re a hatemonger.
Fra dehumanisering til trusler og politisk vold
er der ikke langt, viser de seneste 10-15 svenske år. Her først ny eksempler på det første:
Gefle Dagblad:
“…även om undersökningen inte är statistiskt säkerställd så kan man av tidsserien dra slutsatsen att sverigedemokraterna växer. Med andra ord: De är numera ett hygienproblem för den av främlingsfientliga partier så länge befriade blockpolitiken.”
Dalademokraten:
“Att sverigedemokraterna får 4,4 procent nu enligt Sifo är allvarligt, anser rimligen de flesta i detta land. Några anser dessutom att det partiet är att likna vid en cancer, som sprider sig. Sverigedemokraterna själva, som det invandrar- och främlingsfientliga parti de är, verkar för övrigt bara ha en enda enkelspårig politisk medicin oavsett samhällsproblem: färre invandrare. Det liknar de nyliberaler som bara har sänkt skatt som sin enda politiska medicin. Med halvtid i mandatperioden är det tyvärr två år kvar innan väljarna har chans att politiskt dödförklara alliansregeringen genom att rösta bort den. Förhoppningsvis hålls i det kommande valet även den sverigedemokratiska cancertumörens tillväxt under riksdagsplatsernas fyraprocentsnivå, genom argumentstarka cellgifter och strålbehandling.”
SD Karlsson . Fra den beskrivelse er der ikke langt til trusler og overgreb. En Sverigedemokrat i Landskrona kommenterer er særlig afskyelig gruppevoldtægt af en mindreårig begået af tre unge kosovoalbanere. Så begynder det :








