Herrefolkstale

Israel’s Final Solution For The Goyim

In this video we discuss Harrison Smith’s viral video “Israel’s Eight Front Warfare” to become a world superpower.

Jeg har haft lidt travlt på det sidste til at få meget stof indenbords, men to videoer har gjort indtryk på mig. Det taler godt for sig selv. Om den yderst artikulerede  88-årige Auschwitz-overlever Stephen Kapos er der det at sige, at han ikke vil tale med Holocaust-benægtere, heller ikke dem der benægter det Holocaust, Israel foretager lige nu i Gaza. Der er flere jøder, end man aner i danske medier, der har den holdning.

Såvidt jeg kan se, er det bedste jøder udenfor Israel kan gøre, at fordømme Israels opførsel. At gøre alt for ikke at blive slået i hartkorn med det aktuelle forbryderstyre. Jeg kan ikke se, at det jødiske samfund i Danmark har gjort det.

Det eneste jeg finder om emnet fra dem er Det Jødiske Samfund står sammen med Israel fra 2023. Og det er lige så politisk tonedøvt, som det jeg mange gange har hørt i Synagogen i Krystalgade, nemlig at “DF, SD og AfD er den største fare for europæiske jøder.”

Men tys, tys, de pågældende partier har vist ikke opdaget endnu, hvordan deres kærlighed bliver gengældt.

Herrefolkstænkning

Og nu hvor jeg er ved begrebet. De fleste er klar over, at det gennemsyrer jødisk tro og tænkning, at de er “Guds udvalgte folk,” så for nylig fik jeg lyst til at danne mig et begreb om, hvor udbredt den er. Jeg blev alligevel overrasket over, hvor almindelig den er. Jeg spurgte GROK:

The belief that one’s own group—whether defined by religion, culture, ethnicity, nation, or race—is superior to others is one of the most widespread and recurring patterns in human history and across societies. Anthropologists describe this tendency as ethnocentrism, the view that one’s own way of life is the natural, correct, or superior standard by which to judge everyone else.

Ethnocentrism appears to be nearly universal among human groups. Virtually every documented society, from small-scale hunter-gatherer bands to large civilizations, has exhibited some form of in-group favoritism combined with out-group derogation or a sense of superiority. This isn’t always extreme or violent—it can be as mild as viewing outsiders as strange or less refined—but the core assumption that “we are better” is extremely common.

Why It’s So Widespread

It promotes group cohesion and loyalty (the “in-group” feels united against “out-groups”).
It helps justify resource competition, conquest, slavery, or discrimination.
It often ties into identity-forming myths, origin stories, or religious doctrines.
Examples Across Religions, Cultures, and Peoples

Here are just some prominent historical and cultural cases:

Ancient Greeks called non-Greeks “barbarians” (literally “babblers” who didn’t speak proper Greek), viewing their own culture as the pinnacle of civilization.

Ancient Chinese referred to their land as the “Middle Kingdom” (center of the world), with surrounding peoples seen as peripheral and lesser.

Jewish tradition includes the concept of being God’s “chosen people,” which some interpretations have framed in terms of spiritual mission or distinction (though not always racial/cultural superiority in a modern supremacist sense).

Christianity — Various eras featured claims of Christian superiority, such as during the Crusades, the Doctrine of Discovery (papal bulls justifying European conquest of non-Christians), colonial missions, and some modern supremacist offshoots like Christian Identity.

Islam — Some historical interpretations and movements have included notions of Islamic superiority over non-believers (e.g., certain supremacist views or forced conversions in specific contexts), though mainstream teachings also emphasize tolerance in places like “no compulsion in religion.”

European colonialism — Widespread belief in white/European racial and cultural superiority justified empires, slavery, and the “white man’s burden.”

Nazi Germany — Extreme Aryan racial supremacy leading to genocide.

Hindu nationalism (in some modern forms) and caste-based hierarchies in historical India have included elements of group superiority.

Imperial Japan — Pre-WWII ideology positioned the Japanese as divinely superior.

Many Indigenous and tribal societies — Numerous groups historically viewed neighboring tribes as inferior, enemies, or less human (e.g., some Amazonian or African tribal beliefs about outsiders).

Even smaller-scale societies show this pattern. Anthropological studies consistently find that most peoples consider their customs superior or more “natural” than those of neighbors.

Are There Exceptions?

Very few societies lack any trace of ethnocentrism. The few cases where groups appear more egalitarian toward outsiders tend to be in highly interdependent trading or nomadic contexts, but even then, subtle preferences usually remain.

In short, the answer to your question is: virtually all—or at the very least the overwhelming majority—of human peoples, cultures, religions, and ethnic groups throughout history have, at some point and to some degree, regarded themselves as superior to others.

This appears to be a near-universal human social tendency rather than something limited to a few “bad” groups. The intensity varies enormously (from mild cultural pride to genocidal ideology), but the basic belief pattern is remarkably consistent across time and place.