(del 2 ) – En jordomrejse begynder med det første skridt. I dag tager Cameron det andet. “About bloody time” skriver en kommentator på the Telegraph. Der var 596 af dem torsdag morgen, 2212 af dem her til aften. Mange viser ingen tiltro til det politiske system mere. – UKIP Nigel Farage responds to David Cameron Immigration speech (Steen):
In his most forthright speech on the issue since he became Prime Minister, he will say that mass immigration has led to “discomfort and disjointedness” in neighbourhoods because some migrants have been unwilling to integrate or learn English. Pledging to cut the numbers entering Britain to tens of thousands, rather than hundreds of thousands, Mr Cameron will say that “for too long, immigration has been too high”.
He will also promise to “stamp out” forced marriages, saying that “cultural sensitivity” cannot be allowed to stop the Government from acting.In the speech to party members in Hampshire, the Prime Minister will attack Labour for claiming it was racist to talk about immigration, saying it is “untruthful and unfair” not to speak about the issue, however uncomfortable. David Cameron: migration threatens our way of life.
Italesættelsesparadigmet holder den politiske mainstream i et jerngreb: Den blotte omtale af problemer kan få dem til at “blusse op”. Idyllen er skrøbelig, de vilde horder besidder ingen fri vilje, og aben lander i en krisesituation hos os selv:
Vince Cable today condemned David Cameron’s speech on immigration as ‘very unwise’ and suggested it could ‘inflame extremism’.
The Business Secretary hinted that the Prime Minister was electioneering by giving his first major speech on the controversial issue weeks before local elections. […]
Today, the Business Secretary made clear the Lib Dems – who backed an immigration amnesty during the general election – were distancing themselves.
He said: ‘The reference to the tens of thousands of immigrants rather than hundreds of thousands is not part of the coalition agreement, it is Tory party policy only.
‘I do understand there is an election coming but talk of mass immigration risks inflaming the extremism to which he and I are both strongly opposed.’ […]This will ‘inflame extremism’: Coalition divided as Cable erupts over Cameron’s immigration speech
Hvis den Tyrkiet-logrende og kolonialisme-undskyldende David Cameron nu fremstår som hardlineren i den borgerlige britiske regering får man en fornemmelse af hvor lang vejen til effektive indgreb reelt er (LFPC).
En rygende bombe: Holder Obamas justitsministerium hånden over CAIR?
Kilden til disse oplysninger skulle være en insider i Obamas Department of Justice, og dette ligner umiddelbart noget langt mere alvorligt og substantielt end spekulationerne om fødselsattester og religion. Påstanden er at der er solide beviser der kunne føre til domfældelse af adskillige fremtrædende amerikanske muslimske talsmænd for terrorforbindelser og undergravende virksomhed, men at Obamas administration forhindrer retssager fordi disse talsmænd nyder tætte forbindelser til højtstående embedsmænd og politikere. I dialogens navn forstås – og disse politikere og embedsmænds anseelse tillægges altså større vigtighed end nationens sikkerhed.
Kun fantasien sætter grænserne for konsekvenserne ved en skandalesag over dette, men spørgsmålet er selvfølgelig om mainstreammedierne overhovedet vil røre sagen. Watergate er mange år siden. Og herhjemme må man spørge sig selv om der monstro kunne gøre sig noget lignende gældende: At der i arkiver og på computere hos hemmelighedsfulde afdelinger under politiet findes belastende oplysninger om de præmiemuslimer der nyder anseelse i medierne og som dialogpartnere. Historien anbefales stærkt i sin helhed, her kun citater fra kilden i justitsministeriet (LFPC):
[…] It was always the plan to initially go after the [Holy Land Foundation] leaders first and then go after the rest of the accomplices in a second round of prosecutions. From a purely legal point of view, the case was solid. Jim Jacks [the U.S. attorney in Dallas who prosecuted the Holy Land Foundation executives] and his team were ready to go. There’s a mountain of evidence against all of these groups that was never introduced during the Holy Land trial and it is damning. We’ve got them on wiretaps. That’s exactly why many of these leaders and groups were named unindicted co-conspirators in the first round of prosecutions.
But from a political perspective there was absolutely no way that they could move forward. That’s why this decision came from the top down. These individuals who were going to be prosecuted are still the administration’s interfaith allies. Not only would these Muslim groups and their friends in the media be screaming “Islamophobia” at the top of their lungs and that this is a war against Islam, but the administration would look like absolute fools. It’s kind of hard to prosecute someone on material support for terrorism when you have pictures of them getting handed awards from DOJ and FBI leaders for their supposed counter-terror efforts. How would Holder explain that when we’re carting off these prominent Islamic leaders in handcuffs for their role in a terror finance conspiracy we’ve been investigating for years? This is how bad the problem is. Why are we continuing to have anything to do with these groups knowing what we know? […]
The FBI still has boxes and boxes of stuff that has never even been translated — just like what happened in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. But it’s already been made public that they have copies of money transfers sent by NAIT [the North American Islamic Trust, which holds the property titles of many of the mosques in America — Ed.] directly to known Hamas entities and Hamas leaders. Those came out during the [Holy Land Foundation] trial. But what if we won the case against NAIT and its leaders and the U.S. government finds itself the landlord to hundreds of mosques across the country? How well do you think that would that play in the Muslim community? […] Did Obama and Holder Scuttle Terror Finance Prosecutions?
Ett system som till vissa delar är än mer effektivt än Pravda var
Læs om TT´s ejerforhold – Sveriges Ritzau, men med mere effektiv informationskontrol.
Lampedusa update: Lukkede grænser?
Smuglertur fra Ventimigllia til Paris: 500 Euro. Professionel nyhedsformidling fra Schweizer Fernsehen (tysk, utekstet)








