Ban on headscarves: The ban on headscarves at the Koninklijk Atheneum in Antwerp and the Athenaeum in Antwerp-Hoboken led to massive protests by the Muslim community beginning during the summer holidays. These were the last two secondary schools in Antwerp that permitted the wearing of headscarves. In the new school year, which begins September 1, there will be none. Three hundred pupils threatened to leave the school in protest, although they will not find a single school in Antwerp which allows headscarves.
This decision caused a great deal of fuss. A hundred Muslims (two thirds of whom are not pupils of the school) protested in the court area of the Royal Atheneum in Antwerp. The Imam Nordin Taouil, called for a school strike and even threatened a school revolt of Muslims throughout Flanders.
“The aggressive manner in which the radical Muslims responded, convinced me that the headscarf ban was the right decision,” said Karin Heremans, director of the Royal Athenaeum of Antwerp, where all political and religious symbols — including the headscarf — are now banned. How the Imam, with whom she just had a constructive conversation, could turn 180 degrees in a second like that she still does not understand. “But we stick to our position,” she declares. SE videre på Gov: No Headscarves in Antwerp’s Schools
Burka og frisind
af Torben S. Hansen
Chefredaktør Erik Bjerager argumenterer i Kristeligt Dagblad (22.08.2009), at burkaer ikke er et stort samfundsproblem. Det kan tilføjes – “ikke i Danmark og Vesten i det hele taget”. Men dermed er sagen ikke afgjort, for der findes andre problemer end de sociale og kulturelle. Røvere og terrorister maskerer sig! Først og fremmest er burkaen en maske og en uniform. Den er en krigserklæring og et politisk symbol – på line med hagekors, Ku Klux Klans mundering og kommunistiske symboler. Men nazisme, kommunisme og hvid racisme fra USA’s sydstater hører fortiden til. I dag er Vesten i krig med islamiske fanatikere. De lægger stor vægt på at vise deres magt – også rent visuelt. De betaler klækkeligt for at få piger og kvinder udstyret med tørklæder, niqab og burka. Diskussionen får kun jordforbindelse, hvis den forankres i en forståelse af den førwestfalske og forhistoriske krig, fanatikerne fører mod frihed og demokrati over den halve verden. Hvornår vågner redaktør Bjerager? (Se også Danmark diskuterar burka-förbud – så ser det ut i andra länder.)
Da dødstrusler var comme il faut
Zombietime har en lang post med billeddokumentation fra en ikke så fjern fortid, hvor dødstrusler og dødsønsker mod George W. Bush var upåagtet mainstream. At vi ikke nødvendigvis taler om konkrete trusler er irrelevant; enhver ytring af denne art er absolut strafbar i USA, hvilket er oplevet på det seneste, hvor lignende udfald mod Præsident Obama har ført til ganske anderledes reaktioner i medierne, og en demonstrant med et truende skilt er blevet arresteret og forhørt af Secret Service (LFPC). Death Threats Against Bush at Protests Ignored for Years
Mere, ikke mindre, ytringsfrihed mod svensk antisemitisme
Der er selvfølgelig nogle overfladiske symmetrier mellem Muhammedkrisen og postyret over en antisemitisk rygteartikel i et svensk dagblad. For mit vedkommende betyder dette at jeg ikke kan være enig, når en hustru til en fhv. israelsk ambassadør i Stockholm taler nedvurderende om “the sanctity of the freedom of the press”. Selvfølgelig skal en regering ikke undskylde eller beklage underlødige avisskriverier, heller ikke her, og selvfølgelig ville alting skride hvis man skulle til at definere tilladelige og forbudte ytringer.
Er regeringen ikke direkte part i sagen, så burde denne i det mindste være et vink med en stærkt forsinket vognstang til den om at der er noget bundråddent i den svenske politiske kultur. Den rette reaktion ville derfor være for den at sende stærke signaler fra topplan om at debatten bør være fri, og at der i øvrigt er nultolerance mod venstreekstremistisk og muslimsk trusselskultur. Nåh ja, og så stoppe med at poste penge i det bundløse pali-arabiske hul. For hvad ambassadørfruen beskriver her er en syg, syg svensk politisk kultur (LFPC).
[…] A FEW WEEKS later, the University of Stockholm Student Union decided to hold a “Palestine Day” which was to end with a debate to which the Israeli ambassador was invited. Zvi gave a nice diplomatic speech about the need for compromise and reconciliation which was met with silence. Then the Palestinian representative took the floor and launched into a diatribe about the savage Israeli soldiers: “When they spy a pregnant Palestinian woman these beasts start betting on whether it’s a boy or a girl and then CUT OPEN THE WOMAN to know who won. Furthermore”, he went on, “no young Palestinian woman is safe from them. If she is pretty, they will strip her naked and force her to walk through the streets of Jerusalem.”
I can still remember the shock I felt. We were after all in the auditorium of a university in a modern Western country, not in Ramallah or in Teheran.
The audience duly hissed and booed the hated Israelis. And why not? We were daily pilloried in the press. But it got worse. Soon enough some of this hatred turned to the Jewish community. In October 2003, one Jan Samuelsson, a so-called expert on religion and religious history published an article in one of the leading dailies – Dagens Nyheter, a morning paper with a circulation that equals that of Aftonbladet – explaining that it was legitimate to hate Jews as long as Israel occupied Arab territories.
Here are some choice quotations out of that article: “Muslim hatred of Jews is justified”, “hatred of Jews is primarily a modern phenomenon sparked by the violations that the State of Israel commits against Arabs in the Middle East.” Incidentally, the Israeli Embassy protested, but guess what? The sanctity of the freedom of the press prevailed and nothing was done. […] Michelle Mazel: Abusing freedom of speech
Stockholms jøder holder lav profil
En illustration af at det er nettokonsekvenser der skal fokuseres på, ikke individers personlige kvaliteter – det store muslimske flertal begår næppe antisemitiske overgreb, men deres tilstedeværelse hjælper bare ikke de derboende jøder det mindste, og der findes ingen måde at udskille de aktive antisemitter på. Og hvis der gjorde, ville man så gøre noget ved dem? Dertil kommer det ubehagelige spørgsmål om enabling. Bundlinjen: Skidt for jøderne, næppe meget der kan gøres (LFPC).
The strong Muslim presence in Stockholm makes the Jewish community there apprehensive about taking a public stand against the recent article in the Aftonbladet tabloid reporting Palestinian claims that IDF soldiers stole body organs from Palestinians, Rabbi Isak Nachman, the spiritual leader of two Orthodox synagogues in the Swedish capital, said on Sunday.
“We want to combat this type of thing, but some Jews here are afraid – there are between 400,000 and 500,000 Muslims out of a population of about nine million,” said Nachman, a member of the Rabbinical Centre of Europe. […] Stockholm’s rabbi: Large Muslim population intimidates local Jews, Sverige har fået deres egen ‘Muhammedkrise’
Der er 20.000 jøder overfor en halv million muslimer i Sverige. Måske er det ikke ganske usymptomatisk, at en svensk avis får en krise med Israel, mens en dansk får en med Islam. Fjordman opsummerer historien her, for os der hidtil kun har fået set overskrifterne: FJORDMAN: SWEDISH HYPOCRISY REGARDING ISRAEL AND MUSLIMS. Mine jødiske kilder siger, at organ-historien er en gammel myte, der allerede lanceredes for over ti år siden.(Steen)
Salontonen, tak !
Følgende udsagn optræder i Kroniken ‘ Modstandsbevægelsen mod Pia K. s besættelse‘ (23.8). »Vi er trætte af at se vort land smurt ind i Kjærsgaards opkast, der daglig siver ned over spalterne i landets aviser og får luksuslancering i TV-avisen og TV 2/Nyhederne«. De charmerende ord er forfattet af Malene Fenger-Grøndahl, Rune Engelbreth Larsen og Flemming Chr. Nielsen, som da vist ellers har haft travlt med tonen-i-debatten, ikke sandt? Ak ja. Spørgsmålet til de tre penneførere må af indlysende grunde være: Hvorfor ser du splinten i din broders øje, men lægger ikke mærke til bjælken i dit eget? Lone Nørgaard i Politiken | 25.08.2009 |
Lige for lige ?
Vi tar den lige kort: AEL protesterer over at Wilders ikke bliver tiltalt for at have brugt Kurt Westergaards tegning, der ikke længere findes i FITNA.
Arab-European League comes up with dubious way to protest decision not to indict maker of anti-Islamic film. The Arab-European League in Holland has republished a cartoon mocking the Holocaust three years after it has been removed from its website.The move was aimed to protest the decision not to indict Dutch Lawmaker Geert Wilders over an anti-Islamic movie he produced.The group said authorities in Holland were adopting a “double standard,” as Wilders was not charged despite including Prophet Muhammad caricatures in his film, which angered many Muslims. Arab group republishes Shoah cartoon on website, link til tegningen

[…] After a reader complained that it was “racially offensive,” library authorities decided the book depicted Africans as “monkeys” and chose to remove it from library shelves. It is now locked behind secret doors in Brooklyn’s central library and can be viewed only by appointment.[…]
Children who speak English as their first language are now a minority in inner-city London primary schools, official figures showed yesterday.![skåne+maj+2007+085[2] skåne+maj+2007+085[2]](http://snaphanen.dk/upload/2009/08/skåne+maj+2007+0852-600x391.jpg)