Wilders tale kommer på, når videoen foreligger. Teksten findes nedenfor. – Der er lokalvalg i Berlin den 18 september, en by på 3.5 millioner mennesker. Geert Wilders og Oscar Freysinger (SVP) er til formiddags kommet til Berlin for at støtte den lokale kandidat og formand for Die Freiheit, det tidligere CDU medlem René Stadtkewitz. Mødet foregår på et for tyskere symbolsk sted, et hotel i Bendlerblock, tidligere Oberkommando der Wehrmacht og arnested for den tyske modstand mod nazismen ved blandt andre oberst Stauffenberg og general Olbricht. Det er nu et museum og et must for enhver Berlin farer, Gedenkstätte Deutscher Widerstand. Hele området er afspærret mod omfattende demonstrationer, naturligvis. Vi opdaterer her med tekst og videos.Protest gegen Rechtspopulist Wilders, Islamfeind im bürgerlichen Gewand, Wilders & Co stoppen! Geheimhaltungsstrategie erneut unterlaufen – Fotoserie: Wilders in Berlin: Die große Geert-Show.
Speech of Geert Wilders in Berlin 9/3/2011
The Threat of Europeanization and the Need to Defend the Nation-State
Thank you for inviting me to Berlin. It is an honour to be here in this beautiful city of Berlin. When I was here last year I emphasized how important Germany is for all of us. We all benefit from a healthy, democratic, self-confident Germany.
Much has happened since my last visit. In the Netherlands we were able to achieve many amazing things. We have successfully started to roll back the process of Islamization in the Netherlands.
We have done so in a peaceful way and through the democratic process. Recently, a deranged narcissistic psychopath from Norway committed a horrible crime. In cold blood he murdered nearly eighty innocent fellow citizens. The assassin pretended to be a concerned European. He said that he had committed his atrocity because “It is meaningless to participate in the democratic process.” By Geert Wilders
Hemmeligtstemplede dokumenter afslører britiske Labours forræderi
‘Forræderi’ er et virkeligt begreb der let går inflation i brugen af, men vi kan ikke umiddelbart få øje på bedre betegnelser der opsummerer Labours løgne og dobbeltspil over for den britiske befolkning i forbindelse med Storbritanniens skjulte samarbejde med Gaddafis Libyen. Egentlig kunne det ikke blive værre efter afsløringen af Labours intentioner om at ‘tvære de konservatives næser rundt i mangfoldighed’ ved hjælp af strategisk masseindvandring. Disse afsløringer får måske, måske ikke, konsekvenser for nogle af de involverede Labourpolitikere, men vestlig politik i almindelighed, og britisk i særdeleshed, er så labil at heller ikke dette vil ændre radikalt på noget som helst.
The startling extent to which Labour misled the world over the controversial release of the Lockerbie bomber is exposed today in top-secret documents obtained by The Mail on Sunday.
In public, senior Ministers from the last Labour Government and the Scottish First Minister have repeatedly insisted that terminally ill Abdelbaset Al Megrahi was freed on compassionate grounds in a decision taken by Scottish Ministers alone.
But the confidential papers show that Westminster buckled under pressure from Colonel Gaddafi, who threatened to ignite a ‘holy war’ if Megrahi died in his Scottish cell. […]
The revelations come in documents – some marked ‘UK secret: UK/Libya Eyes Only’ – found strewn on the floor of the British Ambassador’s abandoned residence in Tripoli.
Many of the papers demonstrate the warmth of the relationship between Britain and Libya and, in particular, the extraordinarily close links between the Blair Government and the Gaddafi regime.
The notes show how:
Tony Blair helped Colonel Gaddafi’s playboy son Saif with his ‘dodgy’ PhD thesis while he was Prime Minister.
British Special Forces were offered to train the Khamis Brigade, Gaddafi’s most vicious military unit.
MI6 was apparently willing to trace phone numbers for Libyan intelligence.
Gordon Brown wrote warmly to Gaddafi in 2007 expressing the hope that the dictator would be able to meet Prince Andrew when he visited Tripoli.
MI6’s budget (£150 million in 2002) was readily disclosed to Libyan officials, along with details of how Britain’s Downing Street emergency committee Cobra operates.
Britain’s intelligence services forged close links with Gaddafi’s brutal security units. […]
Uh-oh: En vis oppositionsleders svigerfar er også involveret (LFPC):
Even former Labour leader Neil Kinnock became involved, holding discussions on education with Saif Gaddafi.
Secret files: Labour lied over Gaddafi… who warned of a holy war if Megrahi died in Scotland
UKs ‘Bonnichsen’: Vi må forberede os på overgivelse til Al-Qaeda
Set i almindeligt velinformeret lægmandsperspektiv er der intet, absolut intet, der giver anledning til håb om en ny æra i Churchills tegn. Hvad angår vestlige ledere taler vi allerhøjst om en håndfuld udmeldinger der for den tørstende lyder som assertivitet (“multikulturen har spillet fallit”, den slags). Skal man endelig anlægge et optimistisk perspektiv på Obamas leflen og logren for den muslimske verden og på denne eks-efterretningschefs lidet kløgtige udmelding om svaghed som et udgangspunkt, måtte det være at man spiller kortene over i fjendens lejr, inden det helt tunge skyts sættes ind. Det kan man så tro på alt efter temperament.
Den britiske bindestregs-baronesse må man antage udfylder en rolle ikke ulig Danmarks talende citronmåne, den allestedsnærværende Hans Jørgen Bonnichsen: Fri for embedets snærende bånd kan hun komme med udmeldinger der på den ene side ikke kan tages for officielle, men på den anden side formentlig er utænkelige uden en grad af officiel sanktionering. At tale og have citronmåne i munden, med andre ord. Via Jihad Watch (LFPC):
The former head of MI5, Britain’s intelligence unit, says she hopes the UK and US are looking at different ways to talk to Al Qaeda.
Eliza Manningham-Buller, who ran MI5 until 2007, has used a BBC lecture to say she hopes British and US intelligence are examining who to talk to within Al Qaeda, as well as how and what could be discussed.
But she says negotiations are still a way off.
Baroness Manningham-Buller says military and security responses to terrorism can only go so far and eventually a political settlement with terror groups is needed.
She says the September 11 attacks were “a crime, not an act of war”.
She adds she has always the phrase “war on terror” unhelpful, saying the Iraq invasion was a distraction in the West’s pursuit of Al Qaeda. Former MI5 boss wants Al Qaeda settlement
Bat Ye’or: Had mod Israel er had mod Koranens virkelige rødder
[…] Why Israel? Ye’or asks. “Given the immense territories conquered and Islamized over thirteen centuries of expansion and war,” she writes, “why would Muslim countries keep plotting to destroy Israel?” And further: “Why does the immense oil wealth of Muslim nations nourish a flood of hatred that poisons the heart of humanity against such a small nation? Why is Israel considered so alarming?”
The well-read global citizen might regurgitate something about land, modern Zionism and the post-1948 “plight of the Palestinians,” but these are stock narratives overwriting the age-old reason. “What Israel possesses,” Ye’or explains, “is the Bible.”
To appreciate the depth and breadth of this perhaps obvious but seldom pondered explanation, it’s essential to realize that Jewish and Christian Bible characters, from Abraham to Moses to Jesus, pop up in the Koran as Muslim prophets who actually preach Islam, not Judaism or Christianity. This is the time-wrinkling, religion-morphing way in which Islam repudiates what it regards as falsifications in both the first (old) and second (new) testaments. Given that the Jewish and Christian religious books long predate the Islamic religious book, it’s not surprising that in their Koranic guises the biblical characters “wander,” as Bat Ye’or writes, “in uncertain space with no geographical or temporal references.” Still, Muslims claim that these same “Muslim” characters lived in “Palestine,” Bat Ye’or writes, on the basis of the “Jewish and Christian scriptures that they reject.”
It follows from this highly unstable construct that Islam sees the biblical past as Islamic history “usurped” by Jews and Christians. Thus, “the land in which it took place — though … never mentioned in the Koran — is (considered) a Muslim land, and Jewish and Christian holy sites are all (considered) Muslim,” writes Ye’or, the pre-eminent modern historian of “dhimmitude,” the diminished condition of non-Muslims under Islamic law (Shariah). […] Diana West: The Jihad Is Against the Bible



