Gaza i Holland: video tekstet på tysk:
– Three attacks have been made on synagogues in the Netherlands in the past few days, says the Centre for Information and Documentation on Israel (CIDI). The government is to provide clarification of the incidents in the Lower House today. On Sunday morning, persons unknown started a small fire in an auction house in Amsterdam with a Molotov cocktail. A synagogue located in the same building was “undoubtedly” the intended target, CIDI director Ronny Naftaniel said yesterday. “There are Hebrew texts above the door of the building,” he explained. Naftaniel said that earlier last week, the windows of a synagogue in Haaksbergen were broken. Additionally, persons unknown have tried to set fire to a synagogue in Arnhem, the CIDI director added.‘Three Attacks on Synagogues in Netherlands’,Dutch anti-Israel protests prompt investigation, Gaza in the Netherlands , Geert Wilders: Deutliche Worte zu Rotterdam
Er det “hate-crime” at myrde en svensk bøsse?
Man skal ikke vide sig for sikker. Kvinder og HBT personer tilhører rigtignok særligt beskyttede køn i Sverige, men tilhører forbryderen en særlig beskyttet offer- og folkegruppe, i dette tilfælde entusiastiske (den ene: læs rabiat) muslimer, så kan den onde hensigt bortfalde som dug fra skræppeblade. Jævnfør nedstikningen af to bøsser i Stockholm i sommer. Hate crime var åbenbar for det efterforskende politi, men dommerne mente noget andet trods rigeligt med beviser.
“Bo Albrektsson säger att man i nuläget inte har något klart motiv till mordet. Eftersom 26-åringen var homosexuell har en av polisens teorier varit att det rör sig om ett så kallat hatbrott.– Det finns inget som direkt pekar på ett hatbrott, men man kan aldrig vara riktigt säker. Vi håller alla dörrar öppna tills vidare.De två misstänkta gärningsmännen är nära vänner, men det var bara 17-åringen som kände mordoffret. De var bekanta med varandra sedan någon månad tillbaka. Enligt åklagaren har de även setts före morddagen. Men var och varför de träffades vill han inte gå in på.” Hatbrott från rosengårdselever ?
Ny trend – aggressiv og assertiv fællesbøn?
Via Gates of Vienna (LFPC):
(ANSA) – Rome, January 19 – A group of Muslims who prayed in front of the Colosseum during a protest march against the Israeli offensive in Gaza this weekend was accused of threatening behaviour by centre-right politicians on Monday.
Around 50 Muslims knelt with their backs to the Roman amphitheatre and prayed towards Mecca during the march on Saturday, refueling a row over a similar incident that took place in front of Milan’s Duomo earlier this month, also during a Gaza protest.
‘‘The pseudo-prayers in Milan and in front of the Colosseum are nothing to do with religion – they are threatening and intimidatory acts towards the Italian people,” said Maurizio Gasparri, Senate whip for Premier Silvio Berlusconi’s People of Freedom (PDL) party. […] Muslim Colosseum prayers fuel row
Melanie Phillips: Britain’s Surrender
In Britain, the war in Gaza has revealed the extent to which the media, intelligentsia and political class have simply crumbled in the face of the global jihad.
The U.K. is a major player in European and world politics and is America’s most significant strategic ally. Until now, it has been considered one of Israel’s firm supporters and a linchpin of the Western defense against the world-wide Islamist onslaught. With the reaction to Gaza, however, that reputation is no longer sustainable.
Years of demonizing Israel and appeasing Islamist extremism within Britain have now coalesced, as a result of the media misrepresentation of the Gaza war as an atrocity against civilians, in an unprecedented wave of hatred against Israel and a sharp rise in attacks on British Jews. […]
The police told pro-Israel demonstrators on at least one occasion to put away their Israel flags because they were “inflammatory.” Yet officers allowed some anti-Israel demonstrators to scream support for Hamas — and even to dress up as hook-nosed Jews pretending to drink the blood of Palestinian babies. […]
In fact, the British government has effectively taken the view that Israel should not be allowed to defend itself by military means against the Hamas rockets that ministers have taken care to condemn. […]
The government’s failure to support Israel’s war against Hamas as the front line of the West’s defense against the global Islamic jihad reflects its failure in turn to acknowledge the nature of that world-wide phenomenon.
Last Thursday, Mr. Miliband wrote in the Guardian that there was no single, unified Islamist threat but merely a set of various local grievances, such as Kashmir or the Golan Heights. Such startling ignorance of the goals and ideological antecedents of the Islamic jihad, from Hamas to Hezbollah to Pakistan’s Lashkar-e-Taiba, is of a piece with the British government’s stubborn refusal to accept that the West is under assault from a war of religion. […]
Recently, prominent British Muslims who advise ministers against Islamist extremism wrote an open letter making the veiled threat that unless the government condemned Israel there would be a rise in violence in Britain. […]
Across the spectrum, Britain’s elites are terrified of dealing with militant Islamism. It is hard to avoid the conclusion that, in a pattern which goes back to the foundational Christian blood libel against the Jews, they are concealing their fearful inability to deal with Islamist aggression by displacing the blame onto its Israeli victims instead. Britain’s Surrender
The harder they fall

Ordet landsforræderi skal nok ikke bruges for tit, og bør bruges med en vis varsomhed, dels fordi der som bekendt er såvel en holdningsmæssig som en juridisk betydning, men også fordi de handlinger der refereres til kan afspejle den politiske og elitære konsensus. I grelle tilfælde som Sverige må det i særlig grad give anledning til debat om hvem der definerer ordet. Ligesom man kan kigge på billeder af den velærværdige, velnærede og vældige politiker Peter Brixtofte i hans velmagtsdage og i dag se en tom skal af bluff, sådan kunne man rent hypotetisk forestille sig et fremtidigt opgør med samarbejdspolitikken med terrorbevægelser som Hamas og Hizbollah, som vil gøre billeder som disse fra en pro-arabisk demonstration i Kalmar til møllesten om halsen på pæne, stuerene politikere, og få det berømte billede af Chamberlain og Hitler til at blegne. Men perspektiverne er overvældende, for vi taler jo om hele den politiske mainstream, og dertil den akademiske verden, og alle modtagerne af oliedollars. Det kunne blive Nürnberg i tredje potens. Det er kun et paradigmeskift væk (LFPC).
Fotos: Thoralf Alfsson. Tilsvarende billeder af danske politikere modtages med taknemlighed)
I praksis lovligt i hele Vesten – hvad bliver lovligt næste gang ?
As we can see, this sign was rather popular for the photographers. Child in hijab, mother in niqab. I spoke to a policeman about this sign, but by the time I got him here to show him, the sign had been damaged. He said the crowd wouldn’t support her message anyway, and I disagreed. No way a crowd shouting “allahu akhbar” is going to disagree with this woman.World Zionism Takes a Beating in Melbournistan



Det er ikke os der spiller nazikortet, der vitterligt bliver skamredent i debatten, og endda har fået navnet 
Er der to parter der står sammen … De har dog udeladt hagekorset på det israelske flag af oplagte grunde (LFPC). 


Jeg må med oprigtig skam melde at jeg i flere perioder af mit liv gik med partisantørklæde, Arafattørklæde, terroristtørklæde, eller hvad man nu kaldte det, om vinteren. Heldigvis lå der ikke andet i det end et anti-fashion statement, for jeg havde ikke det fjerneste engagement i konflikten dernede. Længere end ‘israelerne er nogle brutale sataner’ gik det ikke, men at jeg ikke så noget odiøst i keffiyya’en afspejlede selvfølgelig at Mellemøstproblematikken var noget man kunne forholde sig lige så nært eller distanceret til som man lystede. Sådan er det desværre ikke længere, og skal man prøve at sætte nogle pejlemærker i udviklingen fra dengang, henimod i dag hvor den foreløbige kulmination synes at være opfordringer til folkemord på gaden – og udbredt ligegyldighed fra medierne, kan man opremse en række af begivenheder der hver især – og sikkert forskelligt for os som individer – har bragt den mellemøstlige sump af vold og had alt for tæt på os. Dertil kan man føje markante personligheder som var udstyret med større vilje end det knusende flertal til at se virkeligheden i øjnene, og som af denne grund opnåede et tvivlsomt ry blandt anstændige mennesker:

